flourocarbon for trolling
Pensacola Fishing Forum
Forum Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
        



flourocarbon for trolling Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 3/14/2008 6:01:51 PM
Ruby Red Lip

Ruby Red LipRuby Red LipRuby Red LipRuby Red LipRuby Red LipRuby Red LipRuby Red LipRuby Red Lip

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 10:56:35 PM
Posts: 43, Visits: 2,268
i went to the saltwater sportsman seminar in mobile last saturday. when they were discussing offshore trolling, george poveromo and the other pros speaking were all about using fluorocarbon for bluewater trolling. using fluorocarbon for bottom bumping and tuna is one thing, but would it make a difference to use it for dolphin/wahoo/billfish trolling?
Post #78541
Posted 3/14/2008 6:12:43 PM


Trigger

TriggerTriggerTriggerTriggerTriggerTriggerTriggerTrigger

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 7:18:09 AM
Posts: 141, Visits: 3,672
I don't think that there would be much benefit over mono, unless you're into a bunch of spooky open water tuna. 

"Hope is not an acceptable course of action."
Post #78546
Posted 3/15/2008 6:03:03 AM
Snapper

SnapperSnapperSnapperSnapperSnapperSnapperSnapperSnapper

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 7:35:39 AM
Posts: 586, Visits: 2,033
I agree; the only times I use flouro trolling is for tuna or slow trolling live hardtails around weedlines or rigs.
Post #78734
Posted 3/15/2008 12:08:36 PM
Mingo

MingoMingoMingoMingoMingoMingoMingoMingo

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 11/10/2008 4:14:52 PM
Posts: 87, Visits: 262
I think it depends on your outlook, look at it from a divers perspective. Ever taken a look at mono at depth, looks like a friggin rope danglin there. That orange high viz looks like police tape at a crack house it REALLY shows up under water. I could spot it 30 feet away in only 50 ft viz. I'm just sayin that if i could see it, i'm pretty sure they could see it. Whether or not it makes a dif using flouro... who knows but i'll try anything once
Post #78899
Posted 3/15/2008 5:51:16 PM


Grouper

GrouperGrouperGrouperGrouperGrouperGrouperGrouperGrouper

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 11/19/2008 8:39:03 AM
Posts: 1,014, Visits: 3,403
No.  It's a waste of money for billfish.  They're big and mean and they're not afraid of a skinny piece of string.  Chunking or live bait fishing for tuna with light line, yes.  Billfish trolling plastic baits, NO.

Remember that those guys are being paid to sell products.

________________________________________________________________________________________


www.topconstructioninc.net

Post #79003
Posted 3/15/2008 6:11:14 PM


Trigger

TriggerTriggerTriggerTriggerTriggerTriggerTriggerTrigger

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 10:50:00 AM
Posts: 197, Visits: 301
go with mono its WAY cheaper and you wont need the flourocarbon for big game trolling

--------------------------------------------------------------------

                          "I piss on Shimanos"

Post #79015
Posted 3/16/2008 4:34:22 PM
Ruby Red Lip

Ruby Red LipRuby Red LipRuby Red LipRuby Red LipRuby Red LipRuby Red LipRuby Red LipRuby Red Lip

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 10:56:35 PM
Posts: 43, Visits: 2,268
appreciate the feedback. i will be sticking with mono.
Post #79476
Posted 3/17/2008 6:11:15 AM
Snapper

SnapperSnapperSnapperSnapperSnapperSnapperSnapperSnapper

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 7:35:39 AM
Posts: 586, Visits: 2,033
"Remember that those guys are being paid to sell products." -Xanadu

Who are those guys? I get paid to sell those products and I DON'T recommend using flouro for trolling. It is entirely to expensive to rig all of your trolling baits on flourocarbon especially when the stuff goes for about 70 bucks for 30 yds. of 150# seaguar. There are still guys who fish marlin with cable leaders. I don't think I would go that route, but it proves a hungry fish will eat if you feed him. I'll stick to my mono for trolling.

Post #79840